With the summer fire season fast approaching, it can be important to remember how beneficial cattle are at reducing fuel loads by doing what they do best: eating the green plant matter that can become tinder for catastrophic fires.
Below is the link to (and text) from a great article by John M. Harper of the University of California:
Benefits of Grazing and Wildfire Risk
By John M. Harper
Historic fire suppression efforts have interrupted the natural fire cycle allowing fuel loads to reach unprecedented levels. Recent catastrophic wildfires, such as those seen in Idaho, Montana, Colorado, and Arizona, have the potential to produce extremely intense and severe burns.
While these fires reduce fuel load, they may also sterilize soils (Wells et al. 1979). These extensive fires may result in loss of biodiversity and the destruction of critical habitat for native plants and animals, which often leads to invasion by invasive species. Given last year’s highly productive grass season, California and the North Coast are at risk for wildfire.
Grazing may reduce fire hazard. Prescribed grazing has the potential to be an ecologically and economically sustainable management tool for reduction of fuel loads. Existing data indicate there are two ways by which grazing impacts the fuel load: removal of vegetation, and hoof incorporation of fine fuels (Nader, et. al., 2007). Fuel management studies have shown that spread rate and flame length decrease as dry grass fuel loads decrease (Scott and Burgan 2005). Livestock grazing may modify the effects of fire in various ways, often by reducing the fuel load (Collins 1987; Noy-Meir 1995).
Diamond, et.al. (2009) showed that targeted grazing in Idaho reduced Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) biomass and cover, which resulted in reductions in flame length and rate of spread. When the grazing treatments were repeated on the same plots in May 2006, Cheatgrass biomass and cover were reduced to the point that fires did not carry in the grazed plots in October 2006.
Additional Idaho researchers, Weber, et. al. (2011), showed that livestock grazing was the most effective means to reduce fuel load (P < 0.0005) compared to recent wildfire (P < 0.05) and livestock grazing with previous wildfire (P < 0.05). See the graph at the end of this post. Livestock grazing provides a viable management tool for fuel load reduction prescriptions that avoids the negative effect of extreme fire intensity where fuel load is high.
Additionally, grazing reduces fuel load in a more selective fashion (Archer 1999) avoiding the potential sterilizing effect that an extremely intense fire may have on soil. Studies in other regions have reported results that corroborate well with the Idaho findings. Within montane forests of Zion National Park, Madany and West (1983) considered livestock grazing the primary factor in the reduction of herbaceous cover. Tsiouvaras et al. (1989)reported that grazing by goats effectively reduced 1- and 10-hour fuel load in coastal forest areas of California. Similarly, Blackmore and Vitousek (2000) found grazing in dry forest ecosystems of Hawaii to be an effective means to reduce continuity of fuels, fire intensity, and fire risk.